Calibrated
back
This is a sample result from a fictional team, computed with the same algorithm the live app uses. When your session reveals, this is the kind of map you'll see.
Q3 planning offsite
6 priorities · 6 ballots · revealed
Consensus ranking
1
Ship the enterprise tier
3 dissents
2
Fix onboarding drop-off
3 dissents
3
Hire a sales lead
3 dissents
4
Pay down infra debt
3 dissents
5
Launch the mobile app
2 dissents
6
Double down on content marketing
2 dissents
This is the ordering that requires the fewest changed minds across all 6 ballots. 8 disagreements remain, and no ordering can do better. The bar shows how contested each item's placement is.
Debate these
Ship the enterprise tier vs Fix onboarding drop-off
room split 3 to 3
For Ship the enterprise tier: Priya, Dana, Lena
For Fix onboarding drop-off: Nate, Marcus, Sam
Hire a sales lead vs Pay down infra debt
room split 3 to 3
For Hire a sales lead: Priya, Marcus, Lena
For Pay down infra debt: Nate, Dana, Sam
Launch the mobile app vs Double down on content marketing
room split 4 to 2
For Launch the mobile app: Nate, Marcus, Sam, Lena
For Double down on content marketing: Priya, Dana
Already settled
12 of 15 head-to-head calls are unanimous. Don't spend meeting time on them.
Everyone ranks Ship the enterprise tier above Hire a sales lead
Everyone ranks Ship the enterprise tier above Pay down infra debt
Everyone ranks Ship the enterprise tier above Launch the mobile app
Who should talk
Pair up Nate and Priya first. They're 3 swaps apart.
NatePriyaMarcusDanaSamLena
Nate·31202
Priya3·2131
Marcus12·311
Dana213·22
Sam0312·2
Lena21122·
Each number is how many head-to-head calls two people would need to flip to fully agree. Zero means identical ballots; the highlighted cells are the furthest apart. Hover or tap any cell to see exactly where those two disagree.
Treat this as a map for the conversation, not marching orders.
Run your own session
Run this with your team